Full text
PHINEAS D. CLAYTON v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Opinions in this case
- Majority
- Majority
THE COURT.
The petition for an alternative writ of prohibition is denied.
The respondent court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the motion to dissolve petitioner’s attachment (Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc., v. Superior Court, 194 Cal. 146 [228 Pac. 19]), and this power did not depend upon the correctness of the decision (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1102; Dahlgren v. Superior Court, 8 Cal. App. 622 [97 Pac. 681] ; People v. San Diego, 71 Cal. App. 421 [236 Pac. 377]).