G. L. Tilden & Co. v. Superior Court

112 Cal. App. 2d 893 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1952

Full text

G. L. TILDEN AND COMPANY v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent WALKUP DRAYAGE AND WAREHOUSE COMPANY v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent MERCHANTS EXPRESS CORPORATION v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent HAGSTROM'S FOOD STORES, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent HASLETT WAREHOUSE COMPANY v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent MANNINGS, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent J. A. CLARK DRAYING COMPANY, LTD. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent HIGHWAY TRANSPORT INCORPORATED v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent ROBERTSON DRAYAGE COMPANY, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent FOSTERS LUNCH SYSTEM, LTD. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent UNION ICE AND STORAGE COMPANY v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent THE UNION ICE COMPANY v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent PENINSULA ICE COMPANY v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

THE COURT. The facts and issues in these proceedings are similar to those involved in John Breuner Co. v. Superior Court, Civ. No. 15287, ante, p. 304 [246 P.2d 694] this day decided. For the reasons therein stated the orders are affirmed. Petitioners’ application for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 18, 1952. Schauer, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted.