United States v. Rico Maurice Seabrooks

968 F.2d 92 296 U.S.App.D.C. 356 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. UNITED STATES of America v. Rico Maurice SEABROOKS, Appellant. No. 91-3245. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. July 7, 1992. Before WALD, HARRY T. EDWARDS and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. — 1 — This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is — 2 — ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Seabrooks' conviction be affirmed. The evidence, taken as a whole, was sufficient to warrant a jury determination of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Singleton, 702 F.2d 1159 (D.C.Cir.), aff'd en banc, 702 F.2d 1182 (1983). — 3 — The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Rule 15.