Full text
Janet Naegele, as of Rose Cale v. Archdiocese of New York

Loading…
Opinion
39 A.D.3d 270 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 10, 2007
Full text
Janet Naegele, as of Rose Cale v. Archdiocese of New York
Cited by
New York Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2023
E.D. New York · Mar 1, 2019
E.D. New York · Aug 22, 2018
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jan 6, 2015
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Dec 11, 2014
S.D. New York · Apr 3, 2014
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Nov 15, 2012
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jul 14, 2011
E.D. New York · Nov 24, 2010
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Oct 19, 2010
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 24, 2008
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 5, 2008
Parentheticals
reversing denial of motion to dismiss whether plaintiff failed to allege that defendant "knew or should have known" of tortfeasor's propensity to commit alleged acts
finding actions committed “for wholly personal motives” are outside the scope of employment
“conelu-sory allegations” that “priests accept money and things of value from their parishioners” were insufficient “to show that the Archdiocese knew or should have known of [the priest’s] propensity to commit the [fraud] alleged”
lack of evidence that a supervisor knew or should have known of an employee's "propensity to commit the tortious acts alleged ... negates the employer's liability as a matter of law."
"conclusory allegations" that "priests accept money and things of value from their parishioners" were insufficient "to show that the Archdiocese knew or should have known of [the priest's] propensity to commit the [fraud] alleged"