Fieldman v. Smart Choice Communications, LLC

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered October 30, 2006, which, in an action to recover unpaid sales commissions, granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) to dismiss plaintiff’s second and third causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law § 191 (1) (c) and seeking damages under Labor Law § 198 (1-a), unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs first cause of action alleges a failure to pay commissions as required by his written employment contract with defendant LLC, a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York City. The second cause of action invokes the Labor Law against the LLC, and the third invokes it against the LLC’s principals. Neither cause of action, however, asserts an extracontractual wrong, such as payment of commissions in 344 accordance with the contract but in violation of section 191 (1) (c) because made less frequently than once a month. Accordingly, we reject plaintiffs argument that the broad New Jersey choice-of-law clause contained in the contract does not encompass his Labor Law claims (cf. Knieriemen v Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, 74 AD2d 290, 293 [1980], appeal dismissed 50 NY2d 1021 [1980], 51 NY2d 970 [1980] [tort cause of action not covered by contractual choice-of-law clause], overruled on other grounds by Rescildo v Macy’s, 187 AD2d 112, 117 [1993]; Finance One Pub. Co. Ltd. v Lehman Bros. Special Fin., Inc., 414 F3d 325, 334-335 [2d Cir 2005]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sweeny, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ. [See 2006 NY Slip Op 3019KU).]