Loading…

Schoen v. Grossman — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Schoen v. Grossman

17 A.D.2d 778 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 4, 1962

Full text

Arthur Schoen v. Loomis J. Grossman

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

Resettled judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ. 20 Arthur v. Loomis J.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5885476

Citations

17 A.D.2d 778
232 N.Y.S.2d 871
1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7885

Cited by

Zev v. Merman
New York Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1988
Tarlo v. Robinson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Mar 3, 1986
Cohen v. Lovitz
District of Columbia · Jun 9, 1966

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service