Carrington-White v. Malvey

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated June 25, 2008, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. In response to the plaintiffs demonstration of her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, the defendant failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). The defendant’s contention that she must have been struck in the rear by an unidentified vehicle immediately before her vehicle struck a cement barrier, causing her vehicle to then strike the plaintiffs vehicle, was pure speculation (see Woods v Johnson, 44 AD3d 1201 [2007]; cf. Empire Ins. Co. v Lackowitz, 58 AD3d 797 [2009]). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.