Rudat v. Mark Golf Excavating Contracting, Inc.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (William F. Kocher, A.J.), entered September 11, 2008 in a personal injury action. The order granted the respective motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against them and denied plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained as the result of diving into a pond located on property owned by defendants James Rose and Maryann Rose and constructed by defendant Mark Coif Excavating Contracting, Inc. Supreme Court properly granted the respective motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against them. Defendants met their initial burdens of establishing that “plaintiffs act of diving headfirst into water [that] he knew to be shallow was an 1426 unforeseeable superseding event absolving the defendants of any liability” (Donohoe v Town of Babylon, 246 AD2d 576 [1998]; see Olsen v Town of Richfield, 81 NY2d 1024, 1026 [1993]; Howard v Poseidon Pools, 72 NY2d 972, 974-975 [1988]; Smith v Stark, 67 NY2d 693, 694 [1986]), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Present—Scudder, PJ., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Centra, JJ.