Ronald L. Cunningham v. Department of Corrections C. Burnett, Correctional Officer II

979 F.2d 847 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald L. Cunningham, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; C. Burnett, Correctional Officer II, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-6680. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: October 26, 1992 Decided: November 19, 1992 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ronald L. Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. D.Md. AFFIRMED. Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: [1] Ronald L. Cunningham appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cunningham v. Department of Corrections, No. CA-92-144 (D. Md. June 1, 1992). We deny Cunningham's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED