Garnell Steven Hill v. Joseph P. Sacchet, Warden Richard Lanham, Sr., Commissioner

980 F.2d 727 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Garnell Steven HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph P. SACCHET, Warden; Richard Lanham, Sr., Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-6923. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: October 30, 1992 Decided: November 30, 1992 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-92-197-B) Garnell Steven Hill, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. D.Md. Affirmed. Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: OPINION — 1 — Garnell Steven Hill appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Sacchet, No. CA-92-197-B (D. Md. Aug. 24, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED