Full text
The People of the State of New York v. Heron Inniss
The defendant’s contentions raised in point one of his brief are partially unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05
[742] [2]). In any event, those contentions do not warrant reversal (see People v Lewis, 48 AD3d 483, 484 [2008]; People v Wright, 40 AD3d 1021 [2007]; see also People v Singh, 299 AD2d 498, 499 [2002]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.