Opinion

Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.

573 N.Y.S.2d 13 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 7, 1991

Full text

Dennis J. Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc., and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Hill Acme Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant Paul Mueller Company, Third-Party Defendants-Respondents

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Pine

—Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We con1047 elude that this case is not appropriate for summary disposition. It should be determined on a full record. All concur, except Pine, J., who dissents in part and votes to modify, in the following Memorandum.