Full text
Malcolm I. Glazer v. Mitchell T. Williams, Individually and Doing Business as Robinson Law Firm
Opinions in this case
- Majority
- Dissent — Callahandoerr
Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendants failed to meet their burden on this motion for summary judgment to establish as a matter of law that they were not chargeable with malpractice (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557).
All concur except Callahan, J. P., and Doerr, J., who dissent and vote to reverse in the following Memorandum.