Full text
C. Pavlou, Inc. v. Gaetano Gargano, (Action No. 1.) Cardon Brick Corp. v. Frank Cusimano, , (Action No. 2.) Gaetano Gargano, Third-Party PlaintiffsRespondents v. Carmine Sirico, Third-Party DefendantsAppellants. (Action No. 3.)
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in relieving the default of the third-party plaintiffs in responding to the third-party defendants’ notice to admit (see, CPLR 3123, 2005; Gutenplan v Dauman, 154 AD2d 337). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
