finding that exhaustion requirement is met if petitioner made "some effort, however insufficient, to place the BIA on notice of a straightforward issue being raised on appeal" (citation omitted)
Jose Ramirez v. Jefferson Sessions III
finding that exhaustion requirement is met if petitioner made “some effort, however insufficient, to place the BIA on notice of a straightforward issue being raised on appeal” (citation omitted)
Jose Ramirez v. Jefferson Sessions III
emphasizing the Third Circuit’s “policy of liberally construing pro se submissions”
ALSTON v. BAEZ
“when presented with a pro se litigant, we ‘have a special obligation to construe his complaint liberally.’”
JIMI ROSE v. PAWLOWSKI
“The obligation to liberally construe a pro se litigant’s pleadings is well-established.” (citing Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520–21 (1972))
LAZAR v. TOWN OF WES SADSBURY, CHESTER CO., PA
“The obligation to liberally construe a pro se litigant’s pleadings is well-established.” (citing Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520–21 (1972))
PEOPLES v. DELBASO
“The obligation to liberally construe a pro se litigant’s pleadings is well- established.”
UBER DRIVER PARTNER EMERY v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC.
“The obligation to liberally construe a pro se litigant’s pleadings is well- established.”
RODRIGUEZ v. MAHARAJ
“The obligation to liberally construe a pro se litigant’s pleadings is well- established.”
ADDISON v. AMAZON.COM, INC.
“The obligation to liberally construe a pro se litigant's pleadings is well- established.”
SIMS v. THE CITY OF TRENTON
“The obligation to liberally construe a pro se litigant’s pleadings is well- established.”
POWELL v. ADVANCING OPPORTUNITIES
“The obligation to liberally construe a pro se litigant’s pleadings is well- established.”
Sherry Scalercio-Isenberg v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al.
