In re the Claim of Bruno

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 10, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant was employed as a bus driver by the New York City Transit Authority. He was discharged from his employment in December 1991, after his annual physical examination yielded test results that were positive for the presence of cocaine. Claimant had previously tested positive for the presence of cocaine in April 1990. Pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement between claimant’s union and the Transit Authority, a hearing was held before an impartial arbitrator who ultimately found against claimant, upholding the penalty of dismissal. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board thereafter ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits on the ground that he lost his employ 731 ment due to misconduct. We affirm. An employee’s use of cocaine represents a willful disregard of the standards of conduct an employer has the right to expect (see, Matter of Punter [Ross], 43 NY2d 743, 744) and may constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Atkinson [B.C.C. Assocs.—Hudacs], 185 AD2d 415, 416). Substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.