Esposito v. Rea

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant Joan Glee-son appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated October 4, 1996, which deniéd her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and any cross claims insofar as asserted against her. 537 Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint and any cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Joan Gleeson. Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, even if the appellant was negligent in permitting her automobile to run out of gas and pulling over to the side of the road, this was not a proximate cause of the death of the plaintiffs decedent. Rather, at most the appellant merely furnished the condition for the occurrence of the accident (see, Dunlap v City of New York, 186 AD2d 782; Williams v Envelope Tr. Corp., 186 AD2d 797). Furthermore, it was not foreseeable that the plaintiffs decedent would be hit by the oncoming vehicle of the defendant Joseph Rea as a consequence of the appellant’s alleged negligence, especially since the plaintiffs decedent eschewed the comparative safety of the available sidewalk, and instead gratuitously chose to stand in the roadway while the car was being fueled (see, Ventricelli v Kinney Sys. Rent A Car, 45 NY2d 950; Mikelinich v Giovannetti, 239 AD2d 471; Hallett v Akintola, 178 AD2d 744). Accordingly, the appellant demonstrated her entitlement to summary judgment. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.