Loading…

Johnson v. Sloan — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Johnson v. Sloan

249 A.D.2d 915 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 1998

Full text

Cheryl Johnson v. James C. Sloan

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Pineboehm

—Order affirmed without costs. All concur except Pine, J. P., and Boehm, J., who dissent and vote to reverse in the following Memorandum:

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Boehm, Pine
Cluster ID: 6159317

Citations

249 A.D.2d 915
671 N.Y.S.2d 403
1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4992

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service