Full text
In the Matter of Jason B. Nicholas v. Brion Travis
The determination under review was made in accordance with the law and was not irrational (see Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476; Matter of Thomas v New York State Div. of Parole, 286 AD2d 393; Matter of Walker v Travis, 252 AD2d 360; Matter of Carrion v New York State Bd. of Parole, 210 AD2d 403). The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
