Full text
The People of the State of New York v. Peter Kardach
Judgment of conviction and order affirmed. All concurred, except Lambert, J., who dissented upon the ground that the admission of the evidence of the implication of the defendant in independent burglaries, in no wise connected with the property mentioned in the indictment, was prejudicial error requiring a reversal. (See People v. Doty, 175 N. Y. 164.)