Loading…

Fleury v. Roger — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Fleury v. Roger

9 How. Pr. 215 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 15, 1852

Full text

Fleury agt. Roger

Bosworth, J. Held the case under advisement a few days, and ordered the answer to be stricken out as sham and frivolous, with $10 costs.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Bosworth
Judges: Bosworth
Cluster ID: 6275866

Citations

9 How. Pr. 215

Cited by

Armstrong Cork & Insulation Co. v. Pirone
City of New York Municipal Court · Jan 3, 1930

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service