Loading…

Baldwin v. Bald — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Baldwin v. Bald

48 N.Y. 673 · Commission of Appeals · Jan 15, 1872

Full text

George L. Baldwin v. John Dorsay Bald

Lott, Oh. G., reads for affirmance. All concur, except Eael, C., dissenting. Judgment affirmed with costs.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6295006

Citations

48 N.Y. 673

Cited by

Werring v. Selig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 25, 1934
Schlicher v. Vogel
New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 2, 1900
Finley v. Fay
New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service