Loading…

Elliott v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Elliott v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

11 Misc. 2d 136 · Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Feb 27, 1958

Full text

George Elliott v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Hofstadter, Steuer and Aurelio, JJ., concur. Order affirmed, etc.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6300071

Citations

11 Misc. 2d 136
179 N.Y.S.2d 127
1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3799

Cited by

Dafeng Hengwei Textile Co. v. Aceco Industrial & Commercial Corp.
E.D. New York · Oct 20, 2014
Nippon Emo-Trans Co., Ltd. v. Emo-Trans, Inc.
E.D. New York · Sep 14, 1990
Thornock v. Kinderhill Corp.
S.D. New York · May 22, 1989
Trigo Hnos., Inc. v. Premium Wholesale Groceries, Inc.
S.D. New York · Oct 14, 1976
Incontrade, Inc. v. Oilborn International, S. A.
S.D. New York · Feb 12, 1976
Aerotrade, Inc. v. Banque Nationale De La Republique D'Haiti
S.D. New York · May 24, 1974
Waterman-Bic Corp. v. L. E. Waterman Pen Co.
New York Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1959

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service