Loading…

In re Thomas — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

In re Thomas

484 Pa. 532 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 1979

Full text

In re David Eugene THOMAS. Appeal of Don THOMAS and Grace Thomas

Opinions in this case

Majority — Per curiam
Dissent — Manderino

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: Decree affirmed. Each side to pay own costs. MANDERINO, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Brien, Eagen, Larsen, Manderino, Nix, Roberts
Cluster ID: 6391857

Citations

484 Pa. 532
1979 Pa. LEXIS 530
399 A.2d 1063

Cited by

In Re: Adoption of: L.B.M., A Minor
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017
In re Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights Concerning E.F.H.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 3, 2000
In Re Adoption of N.A.G.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1984

Parentheticals

Dissenting Opinion by Manderino, J.
In Re Adoption of N.A.G.
Dissenting Opinion by Manderino, J.
In re Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights Concerning E.F.H.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service