Loading…

Atkins v. Flaherty — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Atkins v. Flaherty

189 Pa. Super. 550 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1959

Full text

Atkins v. Flaherty et ux.

Opinion Per Curiam, The order of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Marshall, reported in 17 Pa. D. & C. 2d 143.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Ervin, Gunther, Hirt, Rhodes, Watkins, Woodside, Wright
Cluster ID: 6412373

Citations

189 Pa. Super. 550
1959 Pa. Super. LEXIS 459
152 A.2d 280

Cited by

In Re: Order Amending Rules 501, 514-516, 1001, 1002, and 1005, and Adopting Rule 514.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings Before Magisterial District Judges
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 2020
Wilmington Savings Fund v. Hill, K.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2020
Smith v. Sperduti
Beaver County Court of Common Pleas · Aug 5, 2005
In re Graves
Third Circuit · Aug 19, 1994
Fleet Consumer Discount Co. v. Graves
Third Circuit · Aug 19, 1994
Shelter v. Woods
Beaver County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 7, 1984
Kehl v. Undereiner
Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas · Jul 3, 1974
Commonwealth v. Blose

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Mifflin County Court of Common Pleas · Jul 2, 1971

Snook v. Eckley

Mifflin County Court of Common Pleas · Jul 16, 1969

Roberts v. Bankes

Columbia County Court of Common Pleas · Aug 14, 1963

Parentheticals

serving process upon defendant by handing copy of process to adult member of family at residence constitutes valid service
Wilmington Savings Fund v. Hill, K.