Loading…

Commonwealth v. Pinno — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pinno

211 Pa. Super. 434 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1967

Full text

Commonwealth v. Pinno

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Hoffman

Opinion Per Curiam, The six judges who heard the argument of this appeal being equally divided in opinion, the judgment of sentence of the court below is affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Ervin, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Cluster ID: 6415441

Citations

211 Pa. Super. 434
1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 802
236 A.2d 569

Cited by

Commonwealth v. Burns
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1969
Commonwealth v. McLean
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1968

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service