Loading…

Commonwealth v. Bell — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bell

213 Pa. Super. 59 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1968

Full text

Commonwealth v. Bell

Opinions in this case

Majority — Pee
Dissent — Spaulding

Opinion Pee Curiam, Order affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Pee
Judges: Hannum, Hoeeman, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Pee, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Cluster ID: 6415672

Citations

213 Pa. Super. 59
1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 720
245 A.2d 661

Cited by

Commonwealth v. Bell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1968

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service