Loading…

Commonwealth v. Dale — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dale

215 Pa. Super. 179 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1969

Full text

Commonwealth v. Dale

Opinions in this case

Majority — Pee
Dissent — Hoefman

Opinion Pee Curiam, Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Pee
Judges: Cercone, Hoefman, Hofeman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Pee, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Cluster ID: 6416296

Citations

215 Pa. Super. 179
1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1100
256 A.2d 871

Cited by

Dale v. Williams
E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1971

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service