Loading…

Commonwealth v. Cephas — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cephas

215 Pa. Super. 411 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1969

Full text

Commonwealth v. Cephas

Opinions in this case

Majority — Cueiam
Dissent — Hoeeman

Opinion Pee Cueiam, Order affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Cueiam
Judges: Cercone, Cueiam, Hoeeman, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Cluster ID: 6416317

Citations

215 Pa. Super. 411
1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1134
258 A.2d 333

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service