Loading…

Tinney v. Hershock — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Tinney v. Hershock

215 Pa. Super. 468 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1969

Full text

Tinney v. Hershock et ux.

Opinions in this case

Majority — Pee
Dissent — Montgomery

Opinion Pee Curiam, Judgment and decree affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Pee
Judges: Cercone, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Pee, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Cluster ID: 6416324

Citations

215 Pa. Super. 468
1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1143
258 A.2d 331

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service