Loading…

Commonwealth v. Woolcutt — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Woolcutt

1970 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1240 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1970

Full text

Commonwealth v. Woolcutt

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Spaulding

Opinion Per Curiam, Order affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cercone, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Cluster ID: 6417061

Citations

1970 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1240
217 Pa. Super. 91
266 A.2d 551

Cited by

Commonwealth v. Woolcutt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1972

Parentheticals

per curiam, Spaulding and Hoffman, JJ., dissenting
Commonwealth v. Woolcutt

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service