Loading…

Commonwealth v. Groom — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Groom

218 Pa. Super. 374 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1971

Full text

Commonwealth v. Groom

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Hoffman

Opinion Per Curiam, Order affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cercone, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Weight
Cluster ID: 6417648

Citations

218 Pa. Super. 374
1971 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1694
279 A.2d 235

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service