Loading…

Commonwealth v. Layton — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Layton

220 Pa. Super. 435 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1972

Full text

Commonwealth v. Layton

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Cercone

Opinion Per Curiam, Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cercone, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Weight
Cluster ID: 6418593

Citations

220 Pa. Super. 435
1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1929
288 A.2d 908

Cited by

Rouse v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 1978
Commonwealth v. Layton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1973
Commonwealth v. Lee
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1973

Parentheticals

dissenting opinion by Judge Cercone in which Judge Hoffman and Judge Spaulding joined.
Commonwealth v. Layton

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service