Loading…

Tonsic v. Wagner — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Tonsic v. Wagner

220 Pa. Super. 468 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1972

Full text

Tonsic et vir v. Wagner

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Hoffman

Opinion Per Curiam, Order affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cer, Cone, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Cluster ID: 6418600

Citations

220 Pa. Super. 468
1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1937
289 A.2d 138

Cited by

Fuhrman v. Mawyer
M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 2024
Bilonoha v. Zubritzky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1975
TONSIC Et Vir. v. Wagner
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 1974

Parentheticals

Judge Hoffman filed a dissenting opinion
TONSIC Et Vir. v. Wagner
Judge HOFFMAN filed a dissenting opinion
TONSIC Et Vir. v. Wagner

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service