Loading…

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Furby v. Novak

224 Pa. Super. 44 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1973

Full text

Furby v. Novak

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Hoffman

Opinion Per Curiam, The six Judges who heard and decided this appeal being equally divided, the judgment is affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cercone, Hoffman, Spaulding
Cluster ID: 6419523

Citations

224 Pa. Super. 44
1973 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1852
302 A.2d 507

Cited by

Padilla v. Hooks International, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1982

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Furby v. Novak — freecase.ai