Loading…

Commonwealth v. Bancroft — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bancroft

224 Pa. Super. 166 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1973

Full text

Commonwealth v. Bancroft

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Hoffman

Opinion Per Curiam, The six judges who heard this appeal being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Hoffman, Jacobs, Spaulding
Cluster ID: 6419537

Citations

224 Pa. Super. 166
1973 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1873
302 A.2d 373

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service