Vanarsdale v. Richards

Per Curiam. The trust involved in this assignment, is peculiarly a subject of equitable cognizance; and though an actual want of chancery powers might compel us to sustain an action at law in the first instance, it does not follow, that a cestui que trust shall not [410] be thrown on his equitable resources, where such have been provided for him. We consider the point to have been already decided. Mr. Randall took nothing by his motion.