Anderson (Jayon) v. State

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JAYON ANDERSON, No. 84182 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. MAR 1 5 2022 ELIZAI3ETH A. BROM CLERK OF UPREME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL ay DEP Trs RK" ytr Y

This is a pro se appeal frorn a district court order denying a motion for credit for time served to correct illegal sentence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Crystal Eller, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for credit for time served, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'

J. Silver

, J. Cadish Pickering

'A claim for additional presentence credit is a challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction and sentence and therefore must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Griffin v. State, 122 Nev. 737, 744, 137 P.3d 1165, 1169 (2006). We express no opinion as to whether appellant could meet the procedural requirements of NRS Chapter SUPREME COURT 34. OF NEVADA

101 I947A Q(CFP. - 08 D3

cc: Hon. Crystal Eller, District Judge Jayon Anderson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT . OF NEVADA

( C)) 1447A 4i0r.