State Of Louisiana v. Tyler Judson

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2022 KW 0152 VERSUS TYLER JUDSON MAY 9, 2022 In Re: State of Louisana, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. DC - 20- 02965. BEFORE: GUIDRY! HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. WRIT GRANTED. When a district court finds, even after sentencing, that a plea of guilty is constitutionally infirm, it retains the authority to vacate the sentence and set aside the plea. State v. Allah, 2017- 0785 ( La. 1/ 9/ 18), 232 So. 3d 554 per curiam) ( citing State v. Lewis, 421 So. 2d 224, 226 ( La. 1982)). A constitutionally infirm guilty plea may be set aside either by means of an appeal or postconviction relief. State v. Dixon, 449 So. 2d 463, 464 ( La. 1984); State v. Young, 2020- 0049 La. App. 1st Cir. 11/ 6/ 20), 315 So. 3d 904 , 907, writ denied, 2020- 01402 ( La. 2/ 9/ 21), 310 So. 3d 177 . In order to properly exercise its discretion and in order for the appellate court to review the exercise of that discretion, the trial court should conduct a hearing or inquiry on defendant' s motion to withdraw a guilty plea. State v. McGarr, 52, 641 ( La. App. 2d Cir. 4/ 10/ 19), 268 So. 3d 1189 , 1197 ( citing Lewis, 421 So. 2d at 225 ). The oral request to withdraw the guilty plea was improperly granted where the record does not show the district court received sworn testimony or evidence regarding defendant' s request to withdraw his guilty plea in this case. Accordingly, the district court' s ruling granting the motion to withdraw the guilty plea is vacated, and this matter is remanded to the district court. On remand, the district court should first ascertain whether defendant — bearing in mind that may he nonetheless be eligible for expungement in the future — desires to withdraw his guilty plea. If he so wishes, only then should the district court hold a contradictory hearing to determine whether the plea is constitutionally infirm and decide whether the plea was induced by what defendant justifiably believed to be a plea bargain but which, as a matter of law, could not be kept. Allah, 232 So. 3d at 554; Dixon, 449 So. 2d at 464 . JMG GH WRC COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT