Goddard v. Chase

Per Curiam. There can be no doubt that these stoves were a part of the house, and passed with it to the plaintiff by the levy of his execution; and so it appears the appraisers considered them The defendant, then, had no right to sever them from the freehold; and in doing it he was a mere trespasser, (a) Judgment on the verdict. (2) Footnotes [(a)] [There can be no doubt that the stoves were not fixtures. — Ed.] [(2)] Vide 4 Co. 62, Herlakenden’s case.—1 Salk. 368, Poole’s case