Austin v. Gage

The Court said that lands descended in another state cannot be considered as assets in this state. Of consequence, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover against the defendants, and he must therefore be called, (a) Plaintiff nonsuit. Footnotes [(a)] [Doolittle vs. Lewis, 7 Johns. Ch. Rep. 5. — Morrill vs. Dilkey, 1 Johns. Ch. Rev 153.— Williams vs. Storrs, 6 Johns. Ch. Rep. 353. — Ed.]