Loading…

Cummings v. Pruden — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Cummings v. Pruden

11 Mass. 206 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 15, 1814

Full text

Daniel Cummings, in Error, versus William H. Pruden

Sed per Curiam. Let the judgment be reversed as to the damages awarded to the defendant, and affirmed as to the costs.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6530469

Citations

11 Mass. 206

Cited by

Tomasello, Jr. v. Walton
Supreme Court of Florida · Aug 29, 1930
Huffstutler v. Louisville Packing Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 14, 1908
Samaha v. Samaha
D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 1901
Merchants' Bank v. Schulenberg
Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1884
Griel v. Loftin
Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1880
Fink v. Bruihl
Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1870
Lisbon v. Lyman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jun 15, 1870
Fowler v. Lawson
Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1854
Edington v. Pickle
Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1853
Eames v. Stevens
Superior Court of New Hampshire · Dec 15, 1852
Jordan v. Dennis
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1844
White v. Holman
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1835

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.