Full text
Giles Andrews v. Wyllis Bartholomew
By the Court.
The fact offered to be shown had no tendency to disprove malice in the defendant, nor for any reason to mitigate the damage. It was immaterial and rightly rejected. (See Craig v. Catlet, 5 Dana, 323. Goodbread v. Ledbetter, 1 Dev, & Bat. 12.)
Judgment on the verdict.
