Full text
Nathaniel E. Chase v. John B. Ingalls
By the Court.
Munroe had the legal possession, and a right in the property, which he might convey. Currier v. Knapp, 117 Mass. 324. His mortgage passed to the plaintiff that right of property, with a corresponding right of possession, which was good as against Munroe, and against any one attaching the property as his. Harrington v. King, 121 Mass. 269.
Exceptions overruled.