Hebron's Case

Carroll, J. In this proceeding under the workmen’s compensation statute, G. L. c. 152, the question to be decided is, the time when payments of one half the incapacity compensation are payable by the Commonwealth under § 37 of the statute. So far as material to this issue, G. L. c. 152, § 37 provides, “ Whenever an employee who has previously suffered a personal injury resulting in . . . the reduction to one tenth of normal vision of one eye with glasses, incurs further disability by the . . . reduction to one tenth of normal vision in an eye, by reason of a personal injury for which compensation is required by this chapter, he . . . shall be paid the compensation provided for by sections [429] thirty-one, thirty-two, thirty-four or thirty-five, in the following manner: One half of such compensation shall be paid by the State treasurer from the fund established by section sixty-five, and the other half by the insurer.” Sections 31, 32, 34, 35 of the statute relate to compensation to be paid in case of death and to general incapacity compensation. Under § 65 certain payments are to be made to the treasurer of the Commonwealth by the insurance company, and from this fund the State treasurer is to make the payments upon the written order of the department for the purposes set forth in § 37. The employee, previous to the injury in question, had lost the sight of his left eye. On November 21, 1919, his right eye was injured in the course of his employment, as a result of which the sight of this eye was affected and gradually grew less, and on December 3, 1921, its vision was reduced to one tenth of normal. The Industrial Accident Board found that the Commonwealth should pay one half the total incapacity compensation from December 3, 1921. The insurer contends that the date when the obligation of the Commonwealth to pay this compensation arose was December 1, 1919, and that the decree of the Superior Court as to reimbursement by the Commonwealth to the insurer for payments made by the insurer beginning December 3, 1921, should be modified so that such reimbursement should begin with payments made from December 1, 1919. The case is before us on the appeal of the insurer. The obligation of the State treasurer under G. L. c. 152, § 37, to pay one half the compensation, arose at the date when the sight of the employee’s right eye was reduced to one tenth of normal. The liability of the insurer began on the eleventh day after the employee’s injury. G. L. c. 152, § 29. The statute providing for this special fund from which the State treasurer was to make the payment, and the payment by him, does not direct that these payments should be made from the eleventh day after the injury. The obligation commences when the “ further disability by the loss or permanent incapacity ” by the “ reduction to one tenth [430] of normal vision in an eye ” begins, and as the reduction of the sight of the right eye to one tenth of normal did not begin, within the meaning of the statute, until December 3, 1921, the payments were to be made from that date. The fund deposited with the State treasurer was not to be used in all cases of total incapacity. It was limited to the specific cases enumerated, where an employee had previously suffered a personal injury resulting in the loss of a hand or foot, or the loss of sight of one eye, and suffered further disability by the loss of the remaining hand, or foot, or loss of sight, in which event “ he, or his dependents, if death results from the injury ” shall be paid the compensation; and the payments to be made from the State fund were limited to the time when the specific disability occurred. The decree directing payment from December 3, 1921, when the disability took place, and the sight was lost, was right. Decree affirmed.