Loading…

Lord v. Folmar & Son — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Lord v. Folmar & Son

57 Ala. 615 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1877

Full text

Lord v. Folmar & Son

STONE, J. The deed offered in evidence, being without a subscribing witness, and without acknowledgment, was inoperative as a conveyance of title, and should not have been received in evidence. — Code of 1876, § 2145; Hendon v. White, 52 Ala. 597. Reversed and remanded.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Stone
Judges: Stone
Cluster ID: 6633196

Citations

57 Ala. 615

Cited by

O'Neal v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad
Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1903
Caperton v. Hall
Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1887
Doe ex dem. Evans v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1884
Chadwick v. Carson
Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1884
Dugger v. Collins
Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1881
Stewart v. Beard
Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1881
Stubbs v. Kahn & Brother
Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1879

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service