reversing interest award where the evidence revealed a range of possible rates and no testimony was presented “about the relevant LIBOR Index on any change date”
Lisa A. Schlechter and Gary James Schlechter v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC, Successor in Interest to CapitalSource International, LLC F/K/A CapitalSource International, Inc.
reversing interest award where the evidence revealed a range of possible rates and no testimony was presented “about the relevant LIBOR Index on any change date”
Kent Walter Miller and Judith A. Miller v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC, Successor in Interest to CapitalSource International, LLC F/K/A CaptialSource International, Inc.
reversing interest award where the evidence revealed a range of possible rates and no testimony was presented “about the relevant LIBOR Index on any change date”
Jose Antonio Barrios v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC, Successor in Interest to CapitalSource International, LLC F/K/A CapitalSource International, Inc.
reversing interest award where the evidence revealed a range of possible rates and no testimony was presented “about the relevant LIBOR Index on any change date”
Guy Bennett Rubin v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC
remanding for new trial where note provided for adjustable rate, no testimony was presented about LIBOR Index on relevant change dates, and “calculation of the interest amount was not a simple ministerial function”
Lisa A. Schlechter and Gary James Schlechter v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC, Successor in Interest to CapitalSource International, LLC F/K/A CapitalSource International, Inc.
remanding for new trial where note provided for adjustable rate, no testimony was presented about LIBOR Index on relevant change dates, and “calculation of the interest amount was not a simple ministerial function”
Kent Walter Miller and Judith A. Miller v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC, Successor in Interest to CapitalSource International, LLC F/K/A CaptialSource International, Inc.
remanding for new trial where note provided for adjustable rate, no testimony was presented about LIBOR Index on relevant change dates, and “calculation of the interest amount was not a simple ministerial function”
Jose Antonio Barrios v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC, Successor in Interest to CapitalSource International, LLC F/K/A CapitalSource International, Inc.
remanding for new trial where note provided for 7 second bite at the apple. See, e.g., Foot & Ankle Ctr. of Fla., LLC v. Vargas, 412 So. 3d 825, 829 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024
Guy Bennett Rubin v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC
“Because the note required recalculation of interest on change dates, calculation of the interest amount was not a simple ministerial function.”
Lisa A. Schlechter and Gary James Schlechter v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC, Successor in Interest to CapitalSource International, LLC F/K/A CapitalSource International, Inc.
“Because the note required recalculation of interest on change dates, calculation of 4 the interest amount was not a simple ministerial function.”
Kent Walter Miller and Judith A. Miller v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC, Successor in Interest to CapitalSource International, LLC F/K/A CaptialSource International, Inc.
“Because the note required recalculation of interest on change dates, calculation of the interest amount was not a simple ministerial function.”
Jose Antonio Barrios v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC, Successor in Interest to CapitalSource International, LLC F/K/A CapitalSource International, Inc.
“Because the note required recalculation of interest on change dates, calculation of the interest amount was not a simple ministerial function.”
Guy Bennett Rubin v. ARCPE Bahamas, LLC