Society of Roman Catholic Church of Diocese of Lafayette and Lake Charles, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Cas. Co.
21 F.3d 675 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 27, 1994
Full text
The Society of the Roman Catholic Church of the Diocese of Lafayette and Lake Charles, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co., Arthur J. Gallagher & Company and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-Cross v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross and v. Allen Godfrey Lee and Lloyds of London, Defendants-Appellees-Cross v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and Fireman's Fund Insurance, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. Centennial Insurance Company v. Houston General Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee and Louisiana Companies, Inc., Third Party
21 F.3d 675w
The SOCIETY OF the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF the DIOCESE OF
LAFAYETTE AND LAKE CHARLES, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY CO., et al., Defendants. ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & COMPANY and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-Cross Appellants, v. INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee-Cross Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Allen Godfrey LEE and Lloyds of London, Defendants-Appellees-Cross Appellees, v. PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and Fireman's Fund Insurance, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, v.
HOUSTON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee and Appellee, Louisiana Companies, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-4068.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 27, 1994.
[1] NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 26 F.3d 1359