Loading…

State v. Sockum — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Sockum

1917 Del. LEXIS 4 · New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Feb 7, 1917

Full text

State v. George U. Sockum

Conrad, J. The court does not agree with the contention made by counsel for the accused, and declines to give binding instructions. After the usual charge in such cases, Verdict, not guilty.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Conrad
Judges: Conrad
Cluster ID: 6677330

Citations

1917 Del. LEXIS 4
29 Del. 350
6 Boyce 350
99 A. 833

Cited by

Modesto v. State
Superior Court of Delaware · Oct 14, 1969
State v. Holland
Superior Court of Delaware · Mar 7, 1963
State v. Rabatin
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Mar 5, 1953
Brown v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 1949
State v. Witsil
New York Court of General Session of the Peace · May 23, 1925

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service