Holmes v. City of New London

Pee Curiam. All of the claims raised on this appeal have basis only if the finding can be corrected. The [478] conclusions of the trial court are legally drawn from the facts as it found them. To interfere with the conclusions would be to substitute different findings of fact. This cannot he done where there is evidence upon which reasoning minds might disagree. Here there is no basis for correcting the finding. This being so, the conclusions must stand. There is no error.